Solutions

What a skill map lets you answer

Knowing what your people can do is not the goal — it is the thing that makes five harder questions answerable. Here is what teams use OrgSkill to settle, from seeing capability clearly through to deciding who gets promoted, where the risk sits, and who to hire.

Skills visibility

Know what your workforce
can actually do

Most organizations infer capability from job titles, tenure and whoever the manager happens to remember. None of those are the same as knowing who can do what.

  • One living map of every skill across every team, kept current by the people doing the work
  • Proficiency levels where nuance matters, a simple yes or no where it does not
  • Coverage by category, so you can see strength and thinness side by side
  • Employees propose changes; managers approve — so the map stays honest without a survey cycle
Skill coverage
Engineering82%
Data & Analytics64%
Design38%
Security12%
Promotion readiness

Answer “is this person
ready?” with evidence

Promotion conversations usually run on impressions and advocacy. The people who are ready but quiet get missed, and the decision is hard to explain either way.

  • Readiness scored against the actual requirements of the current role and the next one
  • The specific gaps named — not "needs more seasoning" but the three skills and the levels
  • Goals with target levels and dates, so progress toward a promotion is trackable
  • The same view the employee sees, so the conversation starts from shared facts
Readiness · Senior Engineer
Current role100%
Next level72%
Gaps to close: System Design 6→8 · Mentorship 4→6
Workforce planning

See where you are thin
before it hurts

Capability risk tends to surface the week someone resigns. By then the options are expensive and slow.

  • Single-point-of-failure detection — the skills only one person holds
  • Category strength across the org, so investment goes where the thin spots are
  • Organizational readiness at a glance, not a quarterly deck assembled by hand
  • Evidence for headcount and training budget that is not an annual survey
Capability risk
1 person holds Kubernetes
1 person holds Financial Modeling
2 people hold Incident Response
Internal mobility

Fill roles from people
you already have

Open roles get posted externally because nobody can quickly say who inside is close. Meanwhile people leave for jobs they could have had internally.

  • Match people to any job profile by how much of its requirements they already meet
  • Career paths make the route to the next role visible to the employee, not just to HR
  • Comparable roles surface moves sideways as well as up
  • Fewer external hires for capability that is already on the payroll
Candidates · Data Analyst L2
A. Diaz92%
R. Chen78%
M. Okafor71%
Resume review

Screen candidates against
the bar you actually set

Résumé screening rewards whoever writes the best résumé. Keyword filters make that worse, not better.

  • Score applicants against a real job profile’s requirements, not a job ad’s keywords
  • Skill translation credits adjacent experience — financial modeling counts toward Excel
  • Every rating comes back with the evidence it was drawn from
  • The same standard used to assess employees, so internal and external candidates compare fairly
Resume Scorer
Candidate A88%
Candidate B61%
Candidate C34%
Who it's for

Every leader gets a different answer

The same skill map, read five ways — each stakeholder sees the cut that helps them decide.

👥

HR Leaders

Get a real-time picture of skill coverage, gaps, and bench strength across the entire organization. Run reports in seconds, not days.

📊

Managers

Know your team’s true capabilities, identify development needs, and make confident staffing and project decisions backed by data.

🏢

Executives

Understand workforce readiness at the org level. Align talent strategy with business objectives and plan for the future with confidence.

🎯

Talent Acquisition

Know exactly where the real gaps are before you post a role. Build precise job requirements backed by live data, not guesswork.

📚

L&D Teams

Target training to real skill-gap data instead of annual surveys — and focus development where it actually moves readiness.

Get started today

See these answers
for your own workforce

Bring clarity to your team's skills, readiness, and growth — and make workforce decisions backed by real data, not guesswork.